When it comes to choosing a reliable and durable case for transporting your valuable equipment, Pelican is a brand that stands out. Their cases are known for their ruggedness, protection features, and spacious interiors.
In this article, we will compare two popular models from Pelican, the 1730 and the 1650, to help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs. The Pelican 1730 and 1650 are both large cases designed to provide maximum protection for your equipment during transport. They are commonly used by professionals in various industries such as photography, videography, military, and outdoor enthusiasts.
Despite their similarities, these cases have distinct differences in terms of size, interior space, durability, and other features. By comparing these two models, we aim to assist you in determining which case would best suit your requirements, ensuring that your equipment remains safe and secure during transit.
- Pelican 1730 offers a larger interior space compared to Pelican 1650, making it more suitable for accommodating heavier equipment.
- Pelican 1730 is constructed with ultra-high-impact polypropylene copolymer, potentially providing better durability and resistance against impacts.
- Pelican 1730 has a higher IP rating for water and dust resistance compared to Pelican 1650, ensuring maximum protection for valuable equipment.
- Pelican 1650 is lighter and more compact, making it more convenient for lighter loads and easier to transport.
Size and Interior Space Comparison
The size and interior space of the Pelican 1730 and 1650 can be objectively compared to provide a comprehensive understanding of their differences, leaving the audience with a sense of awe at the vastness and versatility offered by these two cases.
When it comes to interior organization, the Pelican 1730 offers a slightly larger space than the Pelican 1650. With its dimensions of 34.0’x 24.0’x 12.5’and a weight of 30.0 lbs, the Pelican 1730 provides ample room for storing and transporting various items.
On the other hand, the Pelican 1650 measures 31.6’x 20.5’x 12.6’and weighs 27.6 lbs, making it slightly smaller and lighter than its counterpart. Despite the minor differences in size and weight, both cases offer exceptional interior organization options, with customizable foam inserts that allow for secure storage of delicate equipment.
Whether it be for camera gear, electronic devices, or other valuable items, the Pelican 1730 and 1650 provide the necessary space and protection for their contents, ensuring peace of mind during transport or storage.
Durability and Protection Features
Durability and protection features of both models, 1730 and 1650, can be compared to identify their differences and similarities.
When it comes to material composition, both models are constructed with high-quality materials, with the 1730 being made of ultra-high-impact polypropylene copolymer and the 1650 being made of polypropylene. This indicates that the 1730 may offer slightly better durability and resistance against impacts.
In terms of water and dust resistance capabilities, both models are designed to provide a high level of protection. The 1730 features a watertight O-ring gasket and an automatic pressure equalization valve, ensuring that it remains waterproof and dustproof. Similarly, the 1650 also incorporates a watertight O-ring seal, providing similar protection. However, it is worth noting that the 1730 has a higher IP rating for water and dust resistance compared to the 1650, indicating a potentially higher level of protection.
Overall, both models offer excellent durability and protection features, with the 1730 potentially providing slightly better durability and enhanced water and dust resistance capabilities.
Transportation and Portability
Transportation and portability play crucial roles in evaluating the usability of both models 1730 and 1650, as they determine how easily and conveniently the cases can be moved from one location to another.
When considering weight and carrying capacity, the Pelican 1730 offers a larger volume and can accommodate heavier equipment compared to the Pelican 1650. With a weight of 38.9 pounds and a capacity of 45.3 liters, the Pelican 1730 is suitable for carrying bulkier and heavier items. On the other hand, the Pelican 1650 weighs slightly less at 28.1 pounds and has a capacity of 36 liters, making it more suitable for lighter equipment.
Ease of handling and maneuverability is also an important factor to consider. The Pelican 1730 features four double-throw latches and four stainless-steel padlock protectors, providing secure closure and easy access. It also has two large wheels and a retractable extension handle, allowing for smooth transportation over various terrains.
Similarly, the Pelican 1650 has four double-throw latches and four stainless-steel padlock protectors, ensuring the safety of the contents. It is equipped with two durable wheels and a fold-down side handle, facilitating easy transportation.
Overall, both models offer reliable transportation and portability features, but the Pelican 1730’s larger carrying capacity and additional wheels make it more suitable for heavier equipment, while the Pelican 1650’s lighter weight and compact design make it more convenient for lighter loads.
Ideal Uses and Applications
When considering the ideal uses and applications of the Pelican 1730 and 1650 cases, it is important to evaluate their features and capabilities.
One key aspect that potential buyers often consider is the price comparison between the two models. The Pelican 1730 is generally priced higher than the 1650 due to its larger size and additional features. However, it is essential to note that the price difference reflects the increased capacity and versatility of the 1730 case.
Another significant factor to consider is customer reviews and satisfaction. Both models have received positive feedback from customers, highlighting their durability, water resistance, and overall quality. However, it is worth noting that some users have reported issues with the latches and handles of the Pelican 1650, while the 1730 seems to have fewer complaints in this regard.
Ultimately, the ideal use and application of these cases depend on the specific needs of the user, such as the size and weight of the items to be stored or transported.